Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (157926)	2/6/2002 7:03:14 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, <First, it shows AMD has absolutely NO VISION - they sniff around to see what Intel is successful at, then they try to get into Intel's markets.> Great observation, Paul. Even the AMDroids should not ignore this one. The 'Droids were once praising AMD for selling off every other division to concentrate on x86 CPUs, while ridiculing Intel for trying to diversify but constantly showing losses for non-IAG businesses. Once again, the 'Droids are undergoing a "reality reset." Tenchusatsu

To: Paul Engel who wrote (157926)	2/6/2002 7:06:14 PM
From: Charles Gryba	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, you are the one bitching about AMD shedding all their divisions. Now that they are trying to create a new one you find problems. As far as I know, the Mips architecture is as good as any. The company wasted 15 million. Big deal. I think with AMD's fabbing there's a money making opportunity unless you think Intel will take 100% of the market. C

To: Paul Engel who wrote (157926)	2/6/2002 8:00:48 PM
From: muzosi	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

AMD has absolutely NO VISION unbelievable spin. you mean as opposed to intc which got the strongarm by complete accident ? there was so much talk about palm using it, what happened ? palm is using a txn chip with a regular arm core in it and the really usefull dsp ip from txn itself. arm has been successful way before intel got involved with it, your effort to connect arm's success to intel is just laughable. alchemy's current core has a clock faster than xscale. when is anyone going to use xscale in anything useful?