SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cactus Jack who wrote (47516)2/6/2002 8:01:46 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
<<"Pro forma" is going to be a dirty expression for some time.>>

jpgill: I tend to agree with you...

Yet, CISCO is a far cry from Enron (a firm that cooked the books and funneled things through off-shore partnerships to keep debt off the balance sheets). Cisco also has tens of billions of dollars in cash and they seem to be MUCH HEALTHIER than competitors like Lucent or Nortel. I'm sure Cisco booked profits in a way that they thought was appropriate...I wonder what their auditors have to say about it...?

Regards,

Scott



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (47516)2/6/2002 8:24:28 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
US Senator Levin to introduce stock options bill

Wednesday February 6, 5:21 pm Eastern Time

WASHINGTON, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Accusing Enron Corp. (NYSE:ENE - news) of using stock options to inflate earnings and avoid taxes, Sen. Carl Levin plans to introduce a bill requiring companies to disclose the impact of options on the bottom line, his office said on Wednesday.

The bill, to be unveiled next week, would require companies to treat options on their tax returns the same way they treat them on their financial statements, according to a summary of the bill released by the Michigan Democrat's office.

Enron, the one-time energy trading giant, was able to lower its tax bill by claiming option expenses on its tax returns. At the same time, it boosted its earnings by leaving the expenses off its financial statements, according to Levin's bill summary.

Accounting rules allow option compensation to be kept off a company's books, according to Levin.

To avoid paying taxes of $625 million on income of $1.8 billion, the Houston-based company allegedly claimed stock option tax deductions totalling nearly $600 million.

But it never reported the $600 million as an expense on its financial statements, an expense that would have lowered Enron's income by one-third, had it been reported, Levin's statement said.

Enron officials did not immediately return telephone calls seeking comment.

Levin's bill is co-sponsored by Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, Illinois Democrat Richard Durbin and Illinois Republican Peter Fitzgerald, Levin's spokeswoman said.

The bill would not legislate accounting standards for options or directly require companies to expense stock option pay, but would require companies to tell the government and shareholders the same thing -- whether stock options are an expense and, if so, how much it will impact earnings.



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (47516)2/7/2002 12:57:26 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Satire: Ken Lay's un-American activities

salon.com



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (47516)2/7/2002 10:46:30 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Ex-Enron Official Jeffrey Skilling to Testify; Says He Was in the Dark About Partnerships

By PETE YOST
Associated Press Writer
Thursday February 7, 10:12 am Eastern Time

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The highest-ranking Enron Corp. (ENE - news) executive to undergo congressional questioning about the company's downfall says he didn't know the details of a complex web of partnerships that concealed debt.

Jeffrey Skilling was to testify Thursday along with former Enron attorney Jordan Mintz, who became so concerned about whether the off-the-books partnerships were proper that he tried to rein them in.

``We have found substantial evidence of illegal activity by Enron and its management,'' Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-La., said Wednesday at a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee that he chairs.

The energy trading company's actions ``served to deceive the public about Enron's financial condition,'' Tauzin said. ``It artificially pumped up Enron's stock price and allowed these same executives to enrich themselves with sales of Enron stock.''

Four of Skilling's former colleagues with knowledge of the partnerships were expected to take the Fifth Amendment when they appeared Thursday before the House oversight and investigations subcommittee, which is part of the Commerce Committee.

Rep. James Greenwood, the subcommittee's chairman, said, ``It's hard to imagine that people would be so worried about incriminating themselves if they didn't have some fear that they had in fact broken the law.''

Greenwood, R-Pa., called the Enron debacle ``a tragedy'' and said as a result ``Americans have lost some confidence in the stock market.''

Those expected to refuse to testify were former chief financial officer Andrew Fastow, who made at least $30 million in running several of the partnerships; Michael Kopper, who got at least $10 million; Richard Causey, Enron's chief accounting officer; and Richard Buy, the chief risk officer.

Mintz raised questions with Buy and Causey about how the partnerships were being handled late in 2000, shortly after Mintz became the general counsel for Enron Global Finance.

In memos, Mintz insisted Skilling sign off on one partnership arrangement before it could proceed. Six people signed an approval sheet, but the line next to Skilling's typed name is blank. Causey and Buy were among those who signed.

Skilling's lawyers said his approval wasn't required. But ``based on the documents it looks to us like Skilling wanted to keep his fingerprints off the partnerships,'' said Ken Johnson, the Commerce Committee's spokesman.

In a memo to Skilling on May 22, Mintz wrote: ``I can send such approval sheets to you as a package and you can then sign at your convenience.'' Twelve days earlier, Mintz had gone to an outside law firm because of his concerns about whether the partnerships were proper.

An internal review of Enron conducted by University of Texas law school dean William Powers found that Skilling personally supported the board of director's decision to permit Fastow to proceed with the partnerships.

``It is difficult to understand why Skilling did not ensure that ... controls were rigorously adhered to and enforced,'' Powers' review said.

``Based upon his own description of events, Skilling does not appear to have given much attention to these duties,'' the report added. ``Skilling, who prides himself on the controls he put in place in many areas at Enron, bears substantial responsibility for the failure of the system of internal controls.''

A dozen congressional committees are investigating the Houston-based energy-trading company, as are the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department. Enron entered the biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history on Dec. 2.

Millions of investors lost money, and thousands of current and former Enron employees lost the great bulk of their retirement savings when the company collapsed.

As a result, President Bush has called for legislation granting greater protection for the retirement accounts of average Americans.

Congressional investigators are interested in the fact that in connection with one of the outside partnerships, a family foundation run by Fastow turned $25,000 into $4.5 million over a two-month period. Kopper saw an investment of $125,000 become $10.5 million in less than three years. Lesser players, brought into the network of transactions by Fastow and Kopper, earned $500,000 to $1 million from investments of less than $5,800.



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (47516)2/7/2002 4:24:24 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Former Enron CEO Jeff Skilling Says He Knew of Nothing Wrong at the Company

By PETE YOST
Associated Press Writer
Thursday February 7, 3:47 pm Eastern Time

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former Enron chief executive officer Jeff Skilling told Congress on Thursday that he knew of nothing improper about the complex web of partnerships that brought the energy trading giant down.

When he resigned his post in August, ``I did not believe the company was in any financial peril,'' Skilling said in his first public testimony about the collapse.

And the company's financial statements, ``as far as I knew, accurately reflected'' Enron's condition, Skilling told the House Commerce oversight and investigations subcommittee.

Skilling said he had no knowledge that the partnerships run by his long-time colleague Andrew Fastow were designed to conceal losses.

``It was my understanding that the purpose of the transactions was to provide a real hedge'' -- locking in profits from technology investments, the former CEO said.

Skilling's testimony came as Fastow and three other current and former Enron executives exercised their Fifth Amendment right not to testify at the House hearing.

In contrast to Skilling's testimony, Enron's new chief operating officer, Jeffrey McMahon, said earlier Thursday that he was transferred to a new job shortly after he complained to Skilling about the obscure partnerships in a 30-minute meeting in March 2000. McMahon was treasurer at the time of the meeting.

``His parting words to me were he understood all my concerns and he would remedy the situation,'' McMahon told the subcommittee. McMahon said Skilling called shortly after the meeting and offered him a job elsewhere in the company.

McMahon was named Enron's president and chief operating officer last week.

His testimony followed the refusal by Fastow and ex-executive Michael Kopper to testify. The two are at the center of the partnerships which kept hundreds of millions of dollars in Enron debt off the company's books.

``On the advice of my counsel I respectfully decline to answer the questions,'' said Fastow.

After telling the committee that would be his answer to all questions posed by the panel, Fastow was dismissed.

Kopper also invoked the constitutional protection against self-incrimination. Kopper saw an investment of $125,000 become $10.5 million in less than three years.

After Kopper departed, two current Enron executives, Richard Buy and Richard Causey, also declined to answer questions. Both had knowledge of the partnerships that Fastow and Kopper ran.

McMahon and ex-Enron attorney Jordan Mintz testified they were concerned about conflicts of interest arising out of Fastow's financial interests in the partnerships while he was Enron's chief financial officer.

Mintz suggested that the close relationship between Skilling and Fastow was an obstacle to bringing the partnerships under control.

According to McMahon, Fastow said ``everything Mr. Skilling says, I hear about.''

And Mintz said that Buy -- one of the executives who took the Fifth -- told me ``Jeff is very fond of Andy,'' signifying that Skilling would not do anything about Fastow's partnership.

According to Mintz, Skilling ignored Mintz's repeated requests to meet about the partnerships.

``You tried,'' Mintz said he was told by Causey and Buy.

Mintz said that Fastow left an expletive-laced voice mail for an attorney who Fastow wanted Mintz to fire. The attorney was taking a hard line in negotiations with Fastow's partnership.

Mintz said Cliff Baxter, the Enron executive who recently committed suicide, said over lunch one day that ``he didn't understand why the board was allowing Andy to do this'' by running partnerships. Baxter also complained to Skilling.

Fastow and Kopper collected $40 million for their role in the partnerships -- which investigators say involved self-dealing and conflicts of interest that eventually lead to the energy trading company's collapse.

Fastow was sworn in by Rep. Jim Greenwood, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce oversight and investigations subcommittee. Greenwood was rebuffed when he asked the witness two questions about his handling of company partnerships that hid hundreds of millions of dollars in Enron debt.

``You enriched yourself by tens of millions of dollars'' through deals ``with your own company,'' Greenwood said to him.

As the four current and former Enron executives sat silently in the crowded hearing room, lawmakers called those who drove the company into bankruptcy, ``economic terrorists,'' ``business cowboys'' and ``corporate thieves.''

``This collapse was not brought about by isolated acts of rogue employees. It required the complicity of far more than a few bad apples,'' Greenwood said as he opened Thursday's hearing.

``Was the selling of your morals ... of your souls, worth it?'' asked Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., who said ``millions of dreams'' of people who lost retirement money were ruined by the Enron crash.

Arthur Andersen auditor David Duncan also has invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and refused to testify before Congress. Duncan was fired last month for his role in the shredding of Enron-related documents.

Mintz raised questions with Buy, the chief risk officer, and Causey, the chief accounting officer, about how the partnerships were being handled late in 2000, shortly after becoming general counsel for Enron Global Finance.

In memos, Mintz insisted Skilling sign off on one partnership arrangement before it could proceed. Six people signed an approval sheet, but the line next to Skilling's typed name is blank. Causey and Buy were among those who signed.

Skilling's lawyers said his approval wasn't required.
__________________________

jpgill: Who's Skilling trying to fool...?? He's taking a huge risk by testifying and I'm sure the Justice Department is watching carefully...The prosecuters will work hard to verify what he claims...We may be seeing perjury taking place...I expect Skilling to go to prison -- there will be enough well-placed folks down in the food chain who will testify against him (in exchange for immunity).



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (47516)2/13/2002 4:08:07 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Senators Fill Lay's Silence

Former Enron CEO Vilified on the Hill as He Takes the Fifth
By Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 13, 2002; Page A01

Former Enron Corp. chairman and chief executive Kenneth L. Lay withstood a torrent of criticism from angry senators yesterday before invoking his Fifth Amendment right and refusing to testify about his knowledge of the financial dealings that pushed his company into bankruptcy last fall.

Subpoenaed by the Senate Commerce Committee, Lay said he appeared with a "profound sadness" about what happened to the company he built and to its employees and shareholders and wanted to explain his side of the story.

But he said he could not ignore the advice of his attorneys not to testify under oath. "I am deeply troubled about asserting these [Fifth Amendment] rights because it may seem to some that I have something to hide," Lay said.

Lay became the fifth current or former Enron executive to refuse to testify before congressional committees investigating the company's downfall. The Justice Department and securities regulators also are investigating what Lay and other senior company executives knew about partnerships that an internal Enron board report said were used to inflate profits and hide losses.

In a related development yesterday, Enron told regulators that six members of its board of directors would resign in the next month and that its common stock has been rendered worthless by the company's bankruptcy.

Also, the company withdrew its request to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York to use Vinson & Elkins, its longtime outside law firm, as special counsel on its reorganization. Several large investors criticized the request in light of the board report's conclusion that the law firm should have pushed for more disclosure about the partnerships.

Before being called to the witness table, Lay sat expressionless, attorney Earl Silbert at his side, as senator after senator spent over an hour vilifying his stewardship of the company.

"You are perhaps the most accomplished confidence man since Charles Ponzi," said Sen. Peter Fitzgerald (R-Ill.). "I'd say you're like a carnival barker, except that might not be fair to carnival barkers. A carny will at least tell you upfront that he's running a shell game."

Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.) said he wanted to know "how is it that 29 Enron executives at the top were able to earn $1 billion in stock sales in 2001 while people at the bottom lost everything."

"Obviously, Mr. Lay, the anger here is palpable," said Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.). "Lives are ruined, many lives at the top and at the bottom." Kerry said that Enron had 2,832 offshore partnerships, and he questioned whether they were set up to evade taxes.

Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Ore.), noting that Enron's exotic structure and spectacular collapse shook the financial markets, suggested the company may be an anomaly. "This is not capitalism -- this is a conspiracy that may be a crime," he said.

The scathing criticism yesterday from senators of both parties was in sharp contrast to the reception Lay and Enron had received in Washington in past years. As one of the largest sources of political donations in corporate America, Enron was welcomed heartily on Capitol Hill and in the White House. Most of the members attacking Lay accepted campaign contributions from Enron in the past.

While most members kept clear of partisan rhetoric, Sen Ernest F. Hollings (D-S.C.), the committee chairman, derisively referred to Lay as "Kenny Boy," the nickname given him by his old Texas friend President Bush.

The only mild statements directed at Lay came from Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, a Texas Republican who has received $101,000 in contributions from Enron over the past decade. She said she wanted to hear from Lay about what a CEO can do when a company's stock is in free fall.

After Lay's short appearance, the committee heard from William C. Powers Jr., head of the special committee of Enron's board of directors that issued a report earlier this month condemning the company's board, management, and outside auditors and lawyers for failing to oversee the partnerships run by Enron's chief financial officer.

Powers said his report, damning as it is, examined only a small fraction of the partnerships formed by Enron. It dissected three of those entities, which held $3 billion of the $20 billion in Enron debts that were kept off its balance sheet, he said.

It is "crucial," he said, that the other partnerships be investigated by Congress or authorities with subpoena power. He noted that his committee was unable to learn the identities of the investors in the three partnerships, either from Enron's internal documents or the partnerships themselves, which refused to cooperate.

Enron auditor Arthur Andersen was unwilling to provide much information to the investigators and stopped cooperating altogether when Enron fired the company last month, Powers said.

He also said his committee did not examine possible insider trading by Enron executives, calling it a "very serious issue that needs to be investigated."

Lay was portrayed in the report as a lax manager who "bears significant responsibility for those flawed decisions" to create off-the-books partnerships and let others run them.

Powers said yesterday that both Lay and Jeffrey K. Skilling, Enron's chief executive, knew that Enron's dealings with the partnerships were not arm's-length transactions. They knew, as did Enron's board, he said, that the partnerships included hedges, supposedly designed to protect Enron, that were not real.

He also said material being sought by investigators may have been destroyed by Enron employees who shredded company documents.

Lay has been subpoenaed to appear tomorrow before the House Financial Services Committee, where he is again expected to refuse to testify.

Sherron Watkins, an Enron executive who warned Lay in a letter last summer that the company was in danger of imploding in a "wave of accounting scandals," is slated to appear before a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee tomorrow.

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Enron said its departing directors are John Wakeham, Ronnie C. Chan, John H. Duncan, Robert Jaedicke, Charles LeMaistre and Paulo Ferraz Pereira.

Wakeham, Chan, Jaedicke and Pereira were members of the audit committee criticized in the Powers report as not overseeing the partnerships.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company