SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (142481)2/7/2002 3:39:32 AM
From: TGPTNDR  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578177
 
Ted, HC has a market cap of around $850M. Last July they paid Schlumberger around $700M for a batch of gas compainies, mostly in South America.

biz.yahoo.com

Under the agreement, Hanover will pay Schlumberger $270 million in cash, $150 million in a long-term subordinated note and a number of newly issued Hanover shares having a nominal value of $283 million. The $283 million in Hanover shares issued to Schlumberger will represent between 6.82 million and 8.71 million shares based upon an average closing Hanover share price 30 days prior to the closing of the transaction. Additionally, under the terms of the agreement, Schlumberger will be entitled to receive a distribution of up to $58 million with respect to one of the joint ventures to be acquired by Hanover upon the occurrence of certain events. Hanover management believes the transaction will add annual revenue and EBITDA of approximately $200 million and $90 million, respectively, within one year following the closing of this transaction. ... The increased horsepower, customer contacts and expertise gained in this acquisition and alliance will enable Hanover to further expand its business and compete in the U.S., Venezuela and Argentina, and to materially improve its access to burgeoning markets for such services in the Mideast, Asia and Africa."


Re: <...HC got its first haircut because it had exposure to ENE....>

Yes. I saw that. It was not substantial.

Re: <The two dollar drop yesterday was because a law firm filed a lawsuit on behalf of investors. They are claiming that HC is lying about certain fees.>

That pack of lawyers is sleezbags top to bottom(IMO), and I wouldn't normally give much credence to any of them.

I know what they say about short interest being positive, but I've generally found that the shorts know more about why they're short than the longs do about why they're long.

I can't find any real information on this company. It's all fluf and spit shine. I can't find any real substance for the short interest either. I get the feeling, however, that it's a company that operates 'at the margin', providing goods and services of marginally productive sharply price and demand sensitive goods.

Re: <I am confused. ;~)) And for that reason I am going to cash and sitting this one out.>

That's one of the nice things about investing. You can just hang out 'till something comes along.

I would not, however, be surprised if yesterday's drop was a selloff climax and today's rise was the first day of a bounce. Stochastic fast was getting into the oversold territory.

Good luck!

tgptndr