SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (6040)2/7/2002 5:33:52 PM
From: Sig  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 13815
 
We are going down.
The problem is obvious from tonights earnings
+ 4 vs+ 4c
-14 vs -30
-11 vs -7
-19 vs -8
+1 vs+5
+2 vs +2
+2 vs +5
+6 vs +9
And on and on
Pennies are not earnings! Pennies say the company squeezed everything they could out of the process (x-pro-forma)and still could barely make it. And the economy for these companies is not improving since many are competitors and will have to reduce margins to survive next quarter.
9 cents for Csco -thats not enough - if they hit just a bit harder year a company that size could lose dollars, which could take years to make back.
Many of these companies are running on fumes and hope.
Sig (practicing bear talk)



To: Boplicity who wrote (6040)2/8/2002 12:42:05 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13815
 
07:37 ET Cisco helped by deferred revenues; downgraded by Dresdner (CSCO) 18.61: Merrill Lynch says that demand was overstated by roughly $200 mln due to contingent contracts exercised this qtr for products shipped in previous qtrs; maintains near-term BUY rating. Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is less forgiving, downgrading CSCO to SELL from Reduce citing accounting concerns; says that revenue upside came primarily from recognition of deferred revenues, also argues that gross margins would have been 45% instead of 57% had Cisco followed the same accounting practices as its peers.

-Briefing