SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (2712)2/7/2002 7:47:58 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15516
 
US says it will act to overthrow Saddam

"Pouring scorn on the
notion of an "axis of evil", the French
Foreign Minister, Hubert Védrine, openly
criticised "simplistic" American foreign
policy.
Saudi Arabia, whose bases would
be essential for an invasion of Iraq, also
signalled its opposition."

independent co.uk
By Rupert Cornwell and David Usborne

07 February 2002

In a major policy shift, the US Secretary
of State, Colin Powell, declared
yesterday that there should be a "regime
change" in Iraq and that Washington was
prepared to pursue that goal alone if
necessary.


America is spoiling as never before for
action to settle its unfinished business
with Iraq, the country singled out by
President George Bush as the most
menacing member of his "axis of evil".
Whatever he means, and whatever the
obstacles, the name of the game is clear
– "regime change". But just how this will
be achieved remains clouded in
uncertainty. General Powell told
Congress that Mr Bush was considering
"a full range of options".

Charles Duelfer, a former deputy
chairman of the UN weapons inspectors
and a leading Iraq specialist, said:
"They've taken the decision that the Iraq
problem has to be solved, not managed,
and there's certainly an inclination to do
this militarily. But the details still have to
be worked out."

Various scenarios are being floated, from
fomenting internal opposition to Saddam
Hussein, to striking Iraqi installations or
even dispatching 100,000 or more US
troops to complete the job left unfinished
in 1991.

General Powell told Congress: "We
believe strongly in regime change in Iraq
and look forward to the day when a
democratic, representative government
leads Iraq to rejoin the family of nations."
In an admission of the lack of
international backing for the overthrow of
Mr Hussein, he suggested the US "might
have to do it alone". And he had a curt
answer to Iraq's offer of a new dialogue,
saying this should be "a very short
discussion" in which the UN inspectors,
ejected in 1998, "have to go back on our
terms".

UN diplomats appear equally sceptical
about the chances of a breakthrough at
the proposed meeting between Iraqi
officials and the UN secretary general,
Kofi Annan. They note that similar
encounters had come and gone in the
past with no significant results.

But there is little sense that Washington
is any closer to resolving the fierce
debate over military action in Iraq. One
source close to the Security Council
said: "The battle hasn't been settled. If
Iraq is getting the message that they
might be about to get a thumping that's
OK but there is a very big difference
between the words coming out of
Washington and something actually
happening."

More immediately pressing for the
Council is a two-day meeting, which
started yesterday, between Russian and
American diplomats in Geneva, on
implementing a new Iraq sanctions
regime agreed in November. Once that
deal is in place, the US will be tempted
to force a new showdown over weapons
inspectors. If Iraq still refuses to admit
them, military action could follow.

But Washington would probably find
itself with scant international support, at
least in public. Pouring scorn on the
notion of an "axis of evil", the French
Foreign Minister, Hubert Védrine, openly
criticised "simplistic" American foreign
policy.
Saudi Arabia, whose bases would
be essential for an invasion of Iraq, also
signalled its opposition.

news.independent.co.uk