Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jpthoma1 who wrote (258)	2/7/2002 9:12:30 PM
From: WillP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 613

Just hope that the results of hole 1 to 3 are not known by insiders as one tonne is more representative than 234 kg! Well, I think that hole #3 is known by insiders, and by me. Hole #3 missed, I believe. As for Hole #1, don't hold your breath. It encountered only 23 metres of kimberlite. As for Hole #2, the same thing goes. It hit only 18 metres of kimberlite. Hole #5 missed as well, I think. Hole #6 hit 1.7 metres of kimberlite, and #7 hit about 4 metres. The only other good hole, besides #4 which hit nearly 140 metres before being terminated in kimberlite, was #16, which hit 203 metres, before being terminated while still in kimberlite. Most of the holes were drilled around the edges, but you can see why I have concerns about the geometry of Freightrain.