Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stock Farmer who wrote (57342)	2/8/2002 10:53:13 AM
From: JeffT	Respond to of 77400

First: I certainly do not think we are off to $82. There you go again, making statements in such a way so as to make it sound like that is my opinion. You make your statements in such a way that you can escape by saying you did not say you were quoting me. You sound a lot like an Enron executive I heard yesterday. Learn how to just be straightforward. It will serve you well and make you much more believable. Second: You said we disagree about seizing on only that data which will support ones own preconceived ideas. I cannot believe that you support that kind of moronic discussion, but have it your way, which is to look for support of what you already believe and ignore other information. Just be forewarned that when you use your misleading information to sway others into making misinformed decisions, I and others will take it up with you as we have in the past. Third: "Must admit, posting to the Cisco thread that the stock is more likely to go down than up is a somewhat unpopular stance. Makes for good debate. Even though it's turned out to be true." Here you have totally lost contact with reality. Just look at the last 1,000 posts or so and you will find a great deal of diversity of opinion, which is healthy. You seem to always take exception to someone having a different opinion from yourself. Broaden your mind so that you can begin to allow for others to have their opinions, instead of whining that someone has jumped on you for for your misleading posts. Lastly: You know John, your habit of taking others statements and only responding to a few words of it smacks of an attempt to take things out of context. That is dishonest. You owe the members of this tread, and yourself, some integrity. Jeff