Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: milo_morai who wrote (71145)	2/8/2002 2:01:05 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Milo ReYou just made TWY's point. <<<<<<<< What point, TWY changed his position slightly when he posted this to Jozef. In my opinion, it is not possible for someone working for a large company and in a position to have inside information to not have at least a FEW genuine negative thoughts/opinions/comments about SOME of the things that are going on. <<<<<<< That is why TWY thinks Tench is intentionally misleading us. Because Tench doesn't badmouth his employer (intel) enough. I haven't seen Tench really badmouth anyone, that isn't his style. It may be TWY's style, but it isn't Tench's. Secondly, as I posted to TWY, in an earlier post; a lot of people, on this thread have a natural bias against Intel. He is for Intel. Why give us the ammunition to further badmouth Intel. As far as TWY original point, if Intel has a policy, I have never seen any of the other posters from Intel who post here reprimand Tench for violating it. So I must assume, Intel doesn't have a policy against it. As long as Tech gets his work done, Intel doesn't seem to care. TWY makes it sound like Intel is paying Tench big bucks to spread disinformation on this thread. If Intel is doing that, then Intel isn't getting their money's worth because Elmer, PE, and BMW post far more disinformation; or information, depending upon who one believes.