SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (1412)2/9/2002 12:05:01 PM
From: Jerry in Omaha  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 3602
 
Michael,

From the article you posted by Mark R. Levin <In the end, little benefit will come from these hearings. They afford little more than the sorry spectacle of public officials abusing the public's trust in the name of the public interest. >>

Excuse me for butting in to your discussion with James, Michael, but Levin is absolutely correct. Nothing will be gained by these hearings when such opportunities for hypocritical grandstanding abound.

It should be a dispassionate Justice Department, providing they can raise a working quorum of individuals not associated with Enron, who should seek indictments; and prosecutors, judges and juries who should get to the bottom of this sorry scandal.

But, please allow me to tender a suggestion re the demagogues in Congress. As most all elected officials are attorneys I think we should we should put a ten year moratorium prohibiting anyone who has graduated from law school from running for public office all the way from dog catcher to president.

What do you think?

Jerry suspecting-that-will-never-fly in Omaha



To: greenspirit who wrote (1412)2/9/2002 6:40:49 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 3602
 
Global Crossing Tossed More Cash Around Town Than Enron

FEBRUARY 11, 2002

WASHINGTON OUTLOOK

If Enron (ENE ) has become Exhibit A for campaign-finance reform, Global Crossing's (GX ) adventures in Washington make for an even more audacious--and cautionary--tale of influence-buying. While Enron spent years cultivating lawmakers and party chieftains, the telecom upstart shot to the top ranks of political donors almost overnight. Global Crossing, which filed for bankruptcy on Jan. 28, became a lobbying powerhouse just as fast, as it sought help from lawmakers and regulators to expand its international cable network.

Global Crossing, founded in 1997 by Gary Winnick, a former junk-bond salesman and associate of Michael Milken, contributed $2.9 million to candidates and political parties during the 2000 election, up from just $34,000 in 1998, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). That made Global Crossing, based in Beverly Hills and Bermuda, the fifth-highest donor among communications companies--ahead of WorldCom and BellSouth. Global even topped Enron's $2.4 million in such donations for 2000. "They came out of nowhere and papered the town with money," says Larry Makinson, executive director of CRP.

The then-high-flying telecom was an evenhanded giver: Of its total $3.6 million in contributions since 1998, Republicans pocketed 53%, Democrats got 47%. Top recipients in Congress were key figures in telecom regulation: Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) got $31,000, and Representative Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), $12,500. In 1999, on behalf of Global Crossing, McCain asked the Federal Communications Commission to encourage the development of undersea telecom cables.

The high point of Global Crossing's nonideological courtship was the summer of 2000. The company dished out $250,000 to each party's convention, hosted lavish parties for pols such as Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), and provided all of the Web hosting and connections for the GOP's confab.

Winnick collected powerful friends the way some moguls collect art. The company's onetime president, Leo Hindery Jr., is a top Democratic fund-raiser. Its vice-chairman, Lodwrick Cook, a former ARCO exec, is a prominent GOP giver and friend of ex-President George Bush. In 1998, Bush pere made a speech in Tokyo on behalf of Global Crossing and pocketed shares of stock in lieu of $80,000 for his fee. His holdings were worth millions a year later, when he filed papers to sell some shares.

In 1999, Global Crossing was planning to lay a transpacific fiber-optic cable and faced competition from a powerful consortium of companies, including AT&T (T ) and WorldCom (WCOM ). Winnick hired Anne Bingaman, former Justice Dept. antitrust chief from 1993-96, and Greg Simon, a former domestic policy adviser to Vice-President Al Gore, to lobby the Federal Communications Commission. Global Crossing paid Bingaman, now chairman of Valor Communications in Irving, Tex., an unprecedented $2.5 million for six months' work. The company failed to block the rival group from getting a license but did force it to modify its proposal in ways so it couldn't dominate the market.

Global Crossing wasn't the only brash New Economy company to cut a swath in Washington. But it raised eyebrows because its largesse was so out of proportion to its needs--mostly routine regulatory approvals rather than high-profile legislation. "With Enron, you can list lots of examples of doors that were opened to them," says CRP analyst Holly Bailey. "With Global Crossing, it's hard to fill a page." For Winnick, who was in a hurry to build a global telecom system, the price may have been right. He's now learning, though, as Enron has, that paying the pols won't keep the debt collectors away.

By Amy Borrus

businessweek.com:/print/magazine/content/02_06/c3769068.htm?mainwindow

****************************
BTW---The article you posted : Send in The Clowns....just says it perfectly, IMO!!