Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (150467)	2/9/2002 7:09:59 PM
From: MythMan	Respond to of 436258

It doesn't.. It's the Naz 100 divided by 4. quote.yahoo.com^ndx&d=c qqq-stock-trading.com

To: mishedlo who wrote (150467)	2/9/2002 7:21:41 PM
From: broadstbull	Respond to of 436258

Misheldo on Jan. 29 the Nasdaq low was 1883.49, the same day the low for the QQQ was 37.51. There is no exact way to equate the price since the QQQ tracks the Nas100. As a matter of fact it can't be equated with the nas100 either, due to the fact that the QQQ trades on its own like an individual stock. Sometimes the QQQ will lag... sometimes it leads. The approximation above is the best I could come up with. It'll be interesting to see how close you guys are next week.