Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (10454)	2/9/2002 10:12:58 PM
From: Bill Fischofer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Ask 50 students to write an essay on "what mathematics means to me" and you'll undoubtedly get 50 different perspectives. But ask those same students to solve a list of educational-level-appropriate equations and you'll get no disagreement on the answers. In that sense mathematics is objective. I do understand what you are saying about perception, but it's a question of substrate vs. coloration. A dozen people touring an exhibition may all disagree on what a piece of sculpture may "mean", but they won't disagree that they see it.

To: epicure who wrote (10454)	2/10/2002 12:22:50 AM
From: Frederick Smart	Respond to of 28931

Mathematics... >>The way we perceive mathematics is purely subjective, though.>> ....is received subjectively, but it's impossible, illogical and insane to insert people into numbers. Numbers, especially prime numbers, are the digital - ie. spiritual - extension to letters and words which make up the natural analog effect. Prime numbers correspond to THE END. Numbers correspond to the THE CAUSE. Letters and words correspond to THE EFFECT. And there has to BE THREE (3) for there to be the reality and balance of light, energy and love manifesting. If there's just TWO (2) we are back to dividing, slicing, dicing, competing, judging, claiming and controlling the energy, light and Love. Now TWO (2) can conspire and masquarade to take, define, control and get the energy from THREE (3) which is this third leg. This is mankind's model which manifests the Black - sorry X - Hole. But of those TWO (2) ONE (1) has to claim control and authority over TWO (2) which works for ONE (1) to get, define, slice, dice, sell and control the energy, light, trust and Love from THREE (3). So in every case, wittingly or unwittingly mankind's model HAS to have DA Slave who's under the authority of ONE (1) and who's objective is to get, take, control THREE (3). I "see" the tops of these pyramid slave models blowing up and being exposed ALL over the world from here on out. 911 was a spiritual D-Mark - like the Red Sea opening up. We can stay on the Old side and continue fighting, slicing, dicing, claiming, blaming and shaming or we can walk freely to the other side where this New World of Light, Energy and Love with NO LIMITS is being created and freely received and shared and celebrated by a growing number of individuals as the perfect Love and truth of the Kingdom of God reveals itself to mankind. 119293!1

To: epicure who wrote (10454)	2/10/2002 8:29:20 AM
From: James Calladine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"Each of us does exist in our own private little reality" Absolutely. Even nicely described in the B-52's song, "You're Living In Your Own Private Idaho" (also known as the ego, or the self-contraction). "we share events- but imo we never truly share them perfectly, how can we?" Yes. Because these events are the products of our separated individuality they NEVER absolutely coincide, but can only be shared, in their differentness, via communication in whatever form. HOWEVER, since separated individualities arise IN Consciousness it is possible to fall into that ONE Consciousness with so-called others. That IS a perfectly shared event, because it is not two or more events, just ONE. But it is no longer an "experience" of any of the "participants". I can recommend that as an intensely more satisfying way to live life than separated individuality. Not that I am in that "space" all the time! But I would like to be! Namaste! Jim