Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (112894)	2/10/2002 1:27:20 AM
From: HG	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

If I may butt in, not more than 20% of India would ever hope to qualify as potential mobile phones candidates..... Even that figure is achieved by stretching it...wishful thinking.... I doubt if more than 5% of Indians currently have residential phone connections.... 80% of the people live in rural India where, forget phones, even water and electricity is a luxury. Of 20% urban population, a large percentage lives just at or below poverty line. Edit : I found the %ages thru AskJeeves - around 2%. India today has about 22 million telephones and less than 0.7 million Internet connections for its one billion people. It is obvious that India urgently needs at least 150 to 200 million telephone and Internet connections. tenet.res.in

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (112894)	2/10/2002 1:46:58 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Jorg, true, there are only about 800 million Chinese and 300 million Indians who will probably be able to afford a CDMA phone by 2010. But 1 billion is still quite a crowd if they tried to squeeze into QUALCOMM stadium to watch the Superbowl. You say a third, I say half [not a big difference and maybe your "meaningful future" is sooner than 2010]. Already, with the old, expensive, GSM technology, there are about 150 million Chinese subscribers, with very rapid growth. CDMA will tip the balance to bring the average Chinese into the market. India is more problematic as they haven't done a lot to ditch their 19th century Karl Marx ideas. But they are on the move and a lot can happen in 10 years. They don't have the option of wired phones, so CDMA will be the name of the game. The legacy GSM networks are big in China, but not such a big deal in India, where cellphone penetration remains tiny. But capacity is the issue. Then, cyberspace links will be crucial [see Korean market for demand]. GPRS is DOA. EDGE is bleeding. The Betamax argument is no argument at all. Yes, it's true that the best doesn't always win, either because of network effects, economies of scale, narrow marketing platforms or whatever. But that doesn't mean that worse technologies always win, [or even very often]. The almost universal outcome of technological development is that better technologies win. If the examples were all that common, we wouldn't always hear about the Betamax business [which is debatable anyway - it's not entirely clear that Betamax was better than VHS in any respect which mattered to most consumers]. With RadioOne replacing half the cellphone bill of materials, we are moving way beyond the ASIC sale and some derisory royalties. Mq