SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (43989)2/10/2002 7:27:53 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I'm all for toppling Saddam.

By whom?

Personally, I'm not in favor of the US toppling Saddam. OTOH, I would love to see a homegrown or regional force take care of him. But frankly I don't see him as a US responsibility. We can't turn every tyrant out of business, even though we seemed to try some time back. And I don' t really favor the globalization of the Monroe Doctrine.



To: Lane3 who wrote (43989)2/11/2002 1:53:10 AM
From: TimF  Respond to of 82486
 
I'm not sure that I support the idea of an American attack to topple Saddam. I'd love to see him removed for power but there is no solid evidence of any link to 9/11 and it might seem to much like we are just using 9/11 as an excuse to get rid of anyone who pissed us off. But then I don't think Iraq is going to allow inspectors in or other wise curb its development of ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction and I'd hate to see Saddam with nuclear missiles.

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (43989)2/11/2002 2:47:52 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
An article in the New York Times makes the case against getting agressive with Iran.

A Risky Message to Iran

By ABBAS AMANAT

nytimes.com