Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Mr. Pink's triple pinky award scorecard. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockskeptic who wrote (68)	2/10/2002 9:32:42 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 96

If there was reason to be confident that this "test" was going to be run with any amount of objectivity, I might agree. But so far, the man who runs the "Auricgoldfingerisajerk Fund" has given us very little such confidence indeed. How in the world, for example, does BP justify a $10 basis on ASW?

To: stockskeptic who wrote (68)	2/10/2002 11:30:41 PM
From: benchpress550	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 96

Getting auric was a minor reason why I started this thread. Auric could make a good record with 50 or so good picks and then have a couple bad picks in a row.(insert your evil thoughts at home here)

To: stockskeptic who wrote (68)	2/11/2002 3:36:36 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 96

Well, sonny boy if you are a skeptic, perhaps you can do a tad of work. It takes NOTHING, NADA to follow the links below to see that two of the names our favorite hairy palmed wanker has attributed to me as being short, were not called as shorts. Further to Kevin's point re ASW, if you want to be accurate about what you think I am wrekcommending (which I am not, but hey if if makes you and the "cummulative IQ of a drill bit set") YA FRICKIN OUGHT TO DO "EM ALL AND I REPEAT, YA OUGHTA HAVE THE DATE AND PRICE OF ALL OF THEM" Now, I know Whack5.5times_per_day is incapable of this, but I have higher expectation of YOU. Tell me, honesty, are these two links recommending shorts?!? Message 17024879 (uh sure looks like a short term reversal call to me) Message 17010154 (uh do you really want to besmirch your name by saying that the above is a short call?) Now, young child, go and look at every fricken call I've ever made, see where they are and help your pal the knuckle dragger to do something at least half way correct. And if ya don't get it right, I hold your feet to the fire so much that you'll change your SI moniker and hide. So show us are you a poor loser or are you a man?