Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18545)	2/12/2002 5:54:35 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 281500

Yes, the Shah was a tradegy.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18545)	2/12/2002 8:55:22 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 281500

Forgot, thanks for using the word Moussadeg, a word few seem to have connected within their neurons. Ilmarinen Sorry for the first short reply, a little frustrated with the usage of "both Moussadeg and the Shah", especially that word "both" in front of them. On the other hand, FInland (the Nadinsky "we") have had good relations with Russia "both during the the Romanovs and Lenin", kind of, or more exactly "Alexander and Lenin", but not Stalin, although in a way that too is true, seems it was more a too opprotunistic and optimistic general, maybe historians will finally figure it out, although it has little importance anymore, except for historians. (well, not even for the russian settlers in finnish Carelia, as that too is more a question of the future, not the past, although it legally should have been handed back already, but it wouldn't be any solution to anything)