Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: schrodingers_cat who wrote (139012)	2/11/2002 3:17:44 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Priced as if it is already 2005 and everything worked out beautifully.

To: schrodingers_cat who wrote (139012)	2/11/2002 8:33:08 AM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

>I just want to see some justice... Maybe I'm cynical, but don't hold your breath. Oh I know, I bet they will pay a fine without admitting guilt...now that's gonna deter them from doing it again! Don't be so sure. Didn't Milken do a little time AND pay a $500 million or so fine AND get barred from the securities business for life? And that, IMO, was on much less evidence of an actual crime than appears to exist in the Enron case. One or two of the mid-level guys caught up in the scam will get immunity and provide enough evidence to nail the rest.