Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (10631)	2/12/2002 2:41:57 PM
From: James Calladine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

At core this discussion is about the activity of the ego (or the non-activity of the ego). I am advancing the vantage point that: IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT IS TRANSMITTED, IT WILL NORMALLY BE PERCEIVED "EGOICALLY", OR AS A CONTRACTION OF THE DIVINE You are advancing the vantage point that: "To the extent that my experience does not reflect Adi Da's intentions is the degree to which they have not been effectively communicated" which contains the implicit suggestions that: -- you know what Adi Da's intentions were/are -- what you perceived might be different than that -- the reason is the faulty communication In short, an argument that one would expect an egoic being to put forth! The "verbal-mind" is scarcely ever "pleased" with what Adi Da has to say. But the heart has its own viewpoint, which is much more expansive. My own recommendation (relative to anything you encounter of Adi Da or anyone else) would be to take it in, register what you dislike about it, register what you like about it, and then pass it on to your heart for final processing in the background. Namaste! Jim