Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (1579)	2/12/2002 8:39:22 PM
From: Jagfan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3602

What did they get for that? NOTHING( I'm assuming your number is correct, but it may not be. How much did Dems get?)

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (1579)	2/13/2002 2:59:39 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3602

Well...we COULD talk about UNION MONEY taken from "the working man and woman's paycheck" WITHOUT their permission to donate it to the Democratic party ....soft money OK...easy come, easy go....

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (1579)	2/13/2002 11:11:59 AM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3602

The article did say the Republicans were "pro-business", which doesn't mean (despite your protestations) that they are therefore anti-"little guys". K-Mart looks desperate and with Wal-Mart as competition and stupidly trying to match prices with them their only hope is that their "soft money" causes GWB to add Wal-Mart to the "evil axis" and declare a jihad. Wal-Mart spent $500,000 just to win a little special election in my city. They got 22,000 votes and built a store two blocks from K-Mart and across the street from the local cemetery.