Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (50336)	2/13/2002 4:26:34 PM
From: Thomas Mercer-Hursh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

As I said before, he guilty of non, mis, or malfeasance with regards to Enruin. Do we really know what he knew and how it was presented to him?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (50336)	2/13/2002 4:31:19 PM
From: Judith Williams	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

Re: guilty until proven innocent I'm with UF on this one. Savage's nicely remunerated job on the Enron board required more than rubber-stamping management's initiatives. The whole lot slumbered rather than tending to its fiduciary knitting. Can anyone seriously suggest that Enron's board does not bear partial responsibility for the debacle? It's not a question of guilty until proven innocent imo. Just lifting safeguards surrounding self-dealing with the spc's smells and should have alerted any responsible board member. Not quite the level of alertness one would want in a board member--particularly when major institutions are up in arms over the issue. Judith