SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (158704)2/13/2002 7:28:49 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Fallope, Re: "Indeed, a broad schism is opening in the computer industry between backers of 3GIO and PCI-X. Compaq Computer Corp. has gone on record saying it has no plans to support 3GIO in its servers and has led the charge to define PCI-X as a more evolutionary path."

I don't know about you, but I find 3GIO and PCI-X to be complementary. One can easily create a bridge chip to wire in PCI-X slots, given a 3GIO interface, can't they? And then they'd have both - 3GIO for future expansion and performance, and PCI-X for compatibility and legacy support. It's interesting that the analysts find these technologies destructive, though. I guess that makes it sound more sensational?

wbmw