Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (158708)	2/13/2002 8:29:45 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Dan, Re: "Identical? No. Much less of a difference than the .18 PIII vs. .18 PIII-M? That was the justification I saw quoted in one of the stories." That's what I thought. You are basing the Pentium 4-M on the changes made for Pentium III-M. I bet you suppose that the Pentium 4-M will also have >45W like the desktop part, too. Re: "So what gives AMD the right to charge more for the Athlon MP over the Athlon XP? >> Their less leaky process lets a variable clock save more power." Are you telling me that the Athlon MP is on a different process than the Athlon XP? That's doubtful, and I have no idea what you're talking about with variable clock. Did you mistake Athlon MP for Athlon 4? PowerNow offers a variable clock, but then again, so does SpeedStep, now. wbmw