Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Calladine who wrote (10773)	2/14/2002 9:50:11 AM
From: Bill Fischofer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Well, I think we are reaching some common ground here and this is the nub of it: And finally (for this post), in CWG how does a being in the "God-Godding" slice of things -- come to REALIZE his/her/its "situation" in the scheme of things? -- come to REALIZE (and live AS) the normally unmanifested God in the midst of "God-Godding"? One of the percepts of CWG is There is nothing to do. Enlightenment comes when one realizes that one is already enlightened and simply chooses to know this in one's experience. But beyond this is the realization that being is primal and your choice is always perfect for your soul's intention. This makes perfect sense from the understanding that we are divine beings who may experience "harm" (or anything else) but who cannot be harmed in any way. You can only be yourself. But that is no "restriction" since you can be (or not be) anything you choose. The devotee's frustration is that one can never be oneself by striving to be like one's guru (or anyone else). And as this is true of a "guru" so it is true of God. Again this naturally follows from the understanding that there is only one of us. As God repeatedly observes in CWG: "There is only one of us. The only difference between us is that I know this."