SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Srexley who wrote (227112)2/15/2002 2:24:57 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
Srex, if you store as fine jpeg a 4 mpixel would be about 1.8 or meg or so. It sounds like you are saving tiff files. My sony F707 is a 5 megapixel and saving fine jpeg are about 2.2 meg each and I get 50 to 60 on a 128 meg. I could save in jpeg normal and get 100 plus per 128 meg. My pics are 2560x1920 pixels.

You need to check out.
Subject 52350 Digital Photography

Also some of my yesterdays creations.
10. ducks and a cardinal. gota have some red on valentines day.
pbase.com
pbase.com cardinal in flight.
pbase.com frost hole.

and pbase.com with comments and details.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: Srexley who wrote (227112)2/16/2002 11:41:33 AM
From: George Coyne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I agree that that there is a point of diminishing returns. I save all my pics as "high quality" JPEGs, which for my 2.1 Mgpxl camera comes out to around .5 Mgb/pic. I like HP printers. I have a Deskjet 952c, which provides all the quality I think I need and was under $200. I think they have even better models now in a similar price range. HP has a great exchange program, even out of warranty. Replacement for $60.