To: Neocon who wrote (11155 ) 2/15/2002 11:53:26 AM From: MSI Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284 I gave you the links, the summary, and the book. There are many others as well. I don't know what else I can do. Whatever comments you make are your own responsibility, not mine. You can understand my reaction: you claim that such plans are "hypothetical" Then you say, gee, that's "improper" In fact, it is treason by the top leaders of our military. Worse, it is evidence of a policy that put the concealed parts of our government, with all its power, in direct opposition to we the American people, who pay them. Our attack dogs obviously forgot who they work for. If plans such as these can be officially made by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, what are the limits of treachery behind the scenes, when such secrecy is allowed? As you know, my big concern is unlimited secrecy of government, which creates the potential for unlimited corruption, up to and including murder of large numbers for political gain. This is simple evidence of that. There is a lot more that is being done against the American people, perhaps, but that is sufficient for alarm, and should get people out of their armchairs, at least. It also clearly tells us that the people we hire into the top levels of government do not restrain the more insane elements, nor do they take any action when treason at the highest levels occurs. In other words, we citizens are on our own, when it comes to protecting ourselves against government. This is the same message of the founding fathers, and the purpose of the Amendments. And it is exactly the inevitable creep of a powerful government and system as stated by Eisenhower and Kennedy, who referred to the military-industrial complex and removing the corrupted intel services, prior to leaving office and being assassinated, respectively. When you feel up to it, I would love to know what kind of writing you do. Just curious.