Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (142659)	2/15/2002 3:38:05 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577024

Are you saying that this stuff that was reported is false? This is silly, and you know it. You've got the two parties to a lawsuit telling different stories. That's what lawsuits are about--differences of opinion. This story is isolated and proves absolutely nothing. You must feel silly -- trying to make a case that Bush has lied based on such flimsy information. Now, how about responding to my question for a change? "What is really disingenious about your remarks is that while you criticize Bush for these three non-lies, you fail to criticize Clinton for compulsive lying, which gave us untold hundreds of well-documented lies during an eight-year term as president, and at least as many during his terms as governor of Arkansas. While not as frequent a liar as Clinton, Al Gore was repeatedly caught in lies during his term. Bottom line, it is indeed bizarre that you would see fit to criticize Bush for what, by anyone's measure, is no more than political rhetoric, while you give Clinton/Gore (and for that matter, other liberals like this sleezy Terry McAuliffe, Carville, & Begala) an out and out pass on the tons of serious lies they have told. Why do you do this? "