Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (142670)	2/15/2002 4:48:08 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1577229

And then you go off and start blathering about Clinton. Because there isn't one shred of evidence that Bush has told any lies, I don't accept the proposition that Bush is a liar. Assuming, arguendo, however, that Bush WAS a liar, I don't feel anyone who failed to criticize Clinton for his hundreds of substantial lies has the slightest entitlement to criticizing Bush or anyone else for lying. If one supported Gore (or, for that matter, Nadar) in the last election, there simply is no moral ground for criticism of Bush. Again, there is no evidence Bush lied, so I certainly don't put forth Clinton's pathological lying as any kind of "defense". It is more in the character of, "Where were you when your buddy Clinton was doing it?".