Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tekboy who wrote (18924)	2/15/2002 10:10:58 PM
From: JohnM	Respond to of 281500

That's all I'd claim--that, and that given the vast amounts of crap out there, it's good enough to be worth perusing. Oh, I wish to vigorously disagree. The stuff you've been pointing us to is much better than that. The Palestinian public opinion piece was worth the price of a year's subscription all by itself. I would hope that this energy piece will come to be a part of a full set of articles FA might do on these issues and prove to be quite prescient. I thought the Pollack piece, however, was the in-guys talking to themselves. And it's always fun to be fly on the wall in those conversations. as for the "reading beneath the news" line, that's about as high a compliment as you could pay, because I think that's precisely the goal the editors are trying to achieve. That means I'll keep reading your links and might even fork over some money for a subscription. Now if I replaced The Nation with Foreign Affairs, nah, not going there. John