Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Options 201: Beyond Obi-Wan-Kenobe -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jt101 who wrote (395)	2/16/2002 3:45:43 PM
From: Dan Duchardt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1064

jt101, There are many factors that might influence your choice of which strikes you might favor to implement yoru strategy. We will know for certain which choice is best only after time evolves the potential positions. Nevertheless, I'll tell you the one I find more appealing, and what I like about it. Assuming your 12-25 target range is about right, and given the current downtrend that might continue for a while, I'd want to take a fairly well protected position, with good potential for eroding the short call premium. The short JUL17.5 with the long 2003JAN15 has more appeal to me than the others at the moment. The net debit of 2.55 will almost surely be recovered with future short call premiums, and there is no risk of losing money if CSCO rockets higher. Even if you are called out early on the JUL17.5, the long 2003JAN15 will have enough value for you to close out with a bit of profit. Most likely you will have an opportunity to adjust the short side to improve profit potential if the market begins to firm up, and downside risk becomes less important. If CSCO were to drop fairly quickly to 12.50, you would be down about 1.00, but that would be near the bottom of your target range and you would have several options for improving your upside potential and reducing your risk. Even at July expiration, if CSCO is at 12.50 you should be down less than 1.50 overall, and in position to collect another decent premium on the next round. If it goes even lower, but you remain bullish, you might want to roll the long LEAPS down, and possibly out to 2004 to get the longer term LEAPS at a low price and wait for price improvement to write another round of shorts. The nearer term calls might appear more attractive because of the faster erosion of time premium, but that can be misleading. If this market breaks the recent lows, you might buy back the MAR17.5 for about .20 and make .60, but you will be deeper in the hole than with the longer term short calls. You could make a lot more buying back the JUL17.5 if the market dives soon than you could ever make on the MAR17.5 even if held till expiration. Dan

To: jt101 who wrote (395)	3/13/2002 1:37:00 PM
From: David Lind	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1064

JT101 - I am very ashamed at all the self appointed "experts" on this thread that somebody has not set you straight after your comment "For all you know, I may be wrong to be bullish on CSCO, but I am looking more at option strategies here, than the stock pick." All the options strategies and knowledge in the world will not save you if you do not have a strong opinion of the direction of the underlying stock, and complete confidence in your knowledge of TA and FA. Options have their place, for those who are extremely experienced, successful traders. For those who aren't, you are looking at the real potential of serious losses. There is a very good reason that every financial institution includes a risk clause on materials discussing options. It is to warn newbies like you to run like hell. And they are doing you a favor in saying so.