Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (19014)	2/16/2002 3:39:17 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 281500

Maybe so. But I think you have to look at the leadership in those countries. Saddam for instance is certifiable...

To: Ilaine who wrote (19014)	2/16/2002 5:24:28 PM
From: Elmer Flugum	Respond to of 281500

Keep up that type of talk and you will be getting a less than light knock on your front door...

To: Ilaine who wrote (19014)	2/16/2002 6:34:55 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 281500

How about the rights of sovereign nations to protect themselves through the use of deterrents? I have been to some of those sovereign nations. They would be better off to protect themselves though the use of detergents. lindybill@itsmellsawfulinnaples.com

To: Ilaine who wrote (19014)	2/16/2002 7:12:33 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<We've got a lot of nerve telling other countries they should not have weapons of mass destruction, don't you think?>> Not at all. The US isn't attacking countries because they have different ideaology or religion. The US is trying to stop attacks on our people. If bin Ladin had published papers instead of the people of the US seeing people jump out of the twin towers and the towers falling we wouldn't be at war. BTW the destruction covered an area about 800' x 1000' and 1000 feet in the air.