Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (44179)	2/17/2002 11:23:37 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

You're so full of crap I bet your eyes are brown. I am an equal opportunity antagonist of the type of hate you spew. It makes no difference to me if you are a man or a woman. It is your hateful ideas I despise. Your constant slander and defamation. Your smug condescension. Your denial of reality. Your wont to see a conspiracy, a prejudice, a malice in every poster you seek to denigrate. The victim mentality which has become such a poisonous influence in our society is rampant in your spewage. So, IMO you are UGLY when judged by those posts. And I don't mean that in the physical sense. I have no idea what you look like. Seeing what you have posted, I don't care to meet you either. But that is beside the point. My objections to the crap you peddle are not based on sex but on ideas, the hateful ideas you post are revolting to me. They are the antithesis of the values which have made the US the most prosperous and free nation this earth has ever seen. Not perfect but the best system yet devised by humans. A land of opportunity and potential, not perfect but the best yet devised. And the revulsion for your ideas which you see reflected in my posts has nothing to do with sexism. My sense is that someone as twisted as you are can be affected only by having ugliness equal to that you post reflected back at you. I'd say having read your last post to coug I have been at least partially successful as your post evidences your lamentable effort to rationalize the responses you have received. Now it is your Constitutional right to post your smug hate on this and other threads. And it is my right to post my revulsion to it. And I will continue to do so however you may wish to characterize those responses. JLA

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (44179)	2/17/2002 5:15:59 PM
From: coug	Respond to of 82486

You are very welcome Bonnie, Take care always and good luck m

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (44179)	2/18/2002 1:01:21 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 82486

Your observations pinpoint the blatant hostility that RW men have towards women. All women. Pardon me, mam, but I'm married to one. Have been for 18 years. We've had our differences, as any married couple do, but we work them out and get on with life and our marriage. And you know sumpin? I don't think she regards me as being hostile towards her. Or towards her sister or women in general. And you know something else? I'll bet the statements I just made aren't unique to me. I think they're true, with variations, of most of them men who post in RWET. And another little point: RWET isn't all men. Would you care to ask Carolyn if she feels that she is mistreated by us? Women posters are sparse in RWET, but there are other conservative women on SI. And I don't think they would complain about RWETers. So maybe this is really just a political thing.