Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (2285)	2/17/2002 12:05:00 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

Unless of course you believed that the US involvement really did amount to a war crime. Even if you believed that, I don't know why you would support an international tribunal to prove it. There are many ways in which we could deal with the matter internally, keep our sovereignty, keep whatever national security secrets might come out in a trial, keep our dignity, salvage our reputation and credibility, and not establish any dangerous precedents that might come back and bit us. What effect do you think such a trial would have on our war effort? And since when is undermining our war effort not traitorous? When it's done to skewer Clinton? I don't think so. Karen P.S. I'm sure you realize that I was not calling Clinton a traitor or a sociopath, although I would agree with mysogynist, which is along the lines of sociopath. P.P.S. Funny that the SI spell checker never heard of the word, sociopath...