Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (2291)	2/17/2002 12:23:12 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

I think you are confusing traitorous speech, which is protected by law, with pacifism. A pacifist would say there is an alternative to bombs. That is not traitorous speech. Traitorous speech would be like, saying that any actions against the terrorists are unwarranted. Back to NATO and Bosnia, I really do not know what that was all about. Was it a NATO fundraiser? Was it an act of justice? I don't know. I think your point is correct, that if I favor putting Clinton on trial just for the sake to see him humiliated, and even if that little jolly costs America our sovereignity, then that is traitorous. Putting my personal desires above those of the country. What I think is, that international tribunals are illegal. How can I possibly justify to myself their legitimacy to put on trial some state leaders, but not others? I can't. And I would not want Clinton to be put on trial. But, if I want to put Milosivec on trial, I must be willing to surrender my right not to put Clinton on trial. Clinton surrendered that right. Just another reason I dislike his policies so much. I am sure he is a swell bar jumping buddy to have, though.