To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (227928 ) 2/18/2002 12:11:00 AM From: Raymond Duray Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670 Speaking of Cameras, Is One Aimed At You Now? nytimes.com <Copy> The Great Unwatched By WILLIAM SAFIRE WASHINGTON -- Stipulated: The protection of our capital, its monuments and centers of authority, is a vital national interest. Early in our history, when faced with a potential rebellion of unpaid officers, one of our leaders employed an uncharacteristic emotional trick — pretending to be going blind — to appeal to the infuriated military men not to march on the capital. He soon had them in tears and in hand. In another time, another leader risked all by turning the capital's defense over to the man most opposed to his political aims, gambling that he could later overcome the nation's gratitude to a man on horseback. In our time, after the Pentagon was hit, the White House targeted and the Capitol anthraxed, D.C. again saw itself besieged. But now, in terror of an external threat, our leaders are protecting our capital at the cost of every American's personal freedom. Surveillance is in the saddle. Responding to the latest Justice Department terror alert, Washington police opened the Joint Operation Command Center of the Synchronized Operations Command Complex (S.O.C.C.). In it, 50 officials monitor a wall of 40 video screens showing images of travelers, drivers, residents and pedestrians. These used to be the Great Unwatched, free people conducting their private lives; now they are under close surveillance by hundreds of hidden cameras. A zoom lens enables the watchers to focus on the face of a tourist walking toward the Washington Monument or Lincoln Memorial. The monitoring system is already linked to 200 cameras in public schools. The watchers plan to expand soon with an equal number in the subways and parks. A private firm profits by photographing cars running red lights; those images will also join the surveillance network. Private cameras in banks and the lobbies and elevators of apartment buildings and hotels will join the system, and residents of nursing homes and hospitals can look forward to an electronic eye in every room. A commercial camera atop a department store in Georgetown catches the faces of shoppers entering malls, to be plugged into omnipresent S.O.C.C. Digital images of the captured faces can be flashed around the world in an instant on the Internet. Married to face-recognition technology and tied in to public and private agencies around the world, an electronic library of hundreds of millions of faces will be created. Terrorists and criminals — as well as unhappy spouses, runaway teens, hermits and other law-abiding people who want to drop out of society for a while — will have no way to get a fresh start. Is this the kind of world we want? The promise is greater safety; the tradeoff is government control of individual lives. Personal security may or may not be enhanced by this all-seeing eye and ear, but personal freedom will surely be sharply curtailed. To be watched at all times, especially when doing nothing seriously wrong, is to be afflicted with a creepy feeling. That is what is felt by a convict in an always- lighted cell. It is the pervasive, inescapable feeling of being unfree. As the law now stands, there is no privacy in public places; that's why sports stadiums are called "Snooper Bowls." A whisper to your spouse on your front porch is the public's business, say the courts; and on that intrusive analogy, long-range microphones may soon be allowed to pick up voice vibrations on windowpanes. When your government, employer, landlord, merchant, banker and local sports team gang up to picture, digitize and permanently record your every activity, you are placed under unprecedented control. This is not some alarmist Orwellian scenario; it is here, now, financed by $20 billion last year and $15 billion more this year of federal money appropriated out of sheer fear. By creating the means to monitor 300 million visits to the U.S. yearly, this administration and a supine opposition are building a system capable of identifying, tracking and spying on 300 million Americans. So far, the reaction has been a most un-American docility. It's Presidents' Day. To save the capital and thus the nation, the leader who manipulated his rebellious officers with an emotional pretense of incipient blindness was George Washington, and the one who risked creating a Caesar out of a necessary general was Abraham Lincoln. Neither would sacrifice our freedom to protect his monument. <End Copy> ........................................................... Tom, I got no complaints about the free enterprise system and the American way. Though I'm certain that we understand the terms in different ways, as good Americans are wont to do. I have to draw the line at the newly minted Orwellian nonsense however. The creepy secret stuff that the Shrub and Seldom Seen Cheney are perpetrating. Nothing personal. I just resent the fact that they are trying to take away my freedoms and my American way of life. Hope you can understand. My hat's off to you on your SGI luck. I don't play dem penny stocks, so it's nice to see someone who beat the crowd with a bona fide gamble like that. Have you taken profits? Re: Your words imply a whole lot of folks are dishonest and cheating. It is apparent to me that there is a cancer of corruption that is infesting corporate America. From Andersen to Global Crossing to Enron and beyond there are so many companies that simply are engaged in a corrupt gamesmaship and malevolent lack of concern for the communities from which they sprang. The multi-nationals are amoral hazards to the future of our nation, IMO. And in the opinion of better writers than myself. Focusing so intently on fawning to the needs of the corporate bribers, Dubya appears guilty of selling all the rest of us out for a few miserable shekels. -Ray