Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (142745)	2/18/2002 10:24:46 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575629

While that may sound like a good reason, the simple truth is that Starr was investigating Bill for "obstruction of Justice", not rape Excellent point. But I can't help but believe that if Starr felt there was a prosecutable crime he would have pursued it. Unfortunately, even though Broadderick was exceptionally credible, it WAS 20 years later. My point, though, was that Clinton was NOT merely a womanizer. The evidence is overwhelming, when taken in the aggregate, that he committed crimes against AT LEAST SOME of these women. A person has either got to be blind or stupid not to realize this.