Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: coug who wrote (44237)	2/18/2002 11:16:58 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Of course you keep segmenting and segmenting the hated right wing until you have nothing left but a single poster who is a male, a nut, a sexist, believes in limiting speech, trashes left-wingers, is obscene, and makes fun of Hillary's looks. Pray tell, who is he?

To: coug who wrote (44237)	2/18/2002 11:27:16 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I cannot remember a proposal to curtail sexual activity, with the possible exception of recommending abstinence to teenagers. The cultural promotion of sexual responsibility should offend no one. People can still consult their own conscience on with whom and how they have sex. I agree that it is improper to dwell on Hillary's deficiencies, although I cannot recall anyone trashing the looks of all Democratic First Ladies since Eleanor Roosevelt. Surely, Jackie and Roslynn were not bad, and Lady Bird was mainly matronly. Also, mentioning the looks of Eleanor and Hillary is rare, not "going on continually". Finally, no one would trash our current First Ladies looks, since she is one of the most attractive we have ever had. One would have to be demented to trash her looks. You seem to be shadow- boxing with an enemy you have mostly made up.......