SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AllansAlias who wrote (31484)2/18/2002 2:13:53 PM
From: UnBelievable  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Do You Know Where This Was Originally Posted

Or if he has posted updates and commentary since then, or where they might be if he did?

Thanks



To: AllansAlias who wrote (31484)2/18/2002 2:42:18 PM
From: At_The_Ask  Respond to of 209892
 
HMMM thats not bad. We would then be in a B down at this point. Here are some targets based on that work. Using the SPX as a gauge for the broad markets.

From the bull peak to the sept. low we lost 608 points(Wave w). .382 times 608 gives us a target of 1176 for the total retracement of wave x. The exact post 9-11 high thus far has been 1176, pretty amazing. So I guess we should assume that if we get a flat x we would stop here again after the b down and c up. This would give us an eventual downside target of SPX of 568 for the end of wave y. Perhaps we get a 50% or 62% retrace of the w. This would certainly help as far as lessening financial destruction, it doesn't seem likely that for a zig zag such a large retrace would be in order. Considering the high valuations and massive debt structure that we have this plan seems pretty likely to me.



To: AllansAlias who wrote (31484)2/18/2002 2:56:09 PM
From: Doo  Respond to of 209892
 
Thanks for posting that, Allan, I think......

Could someone very briefly (if possible) explain to an non-Elliotian what the implications are, if any, in the SPX and COMPX/NDX making their highs in 3/00 while the INDU made its high in 01/00 as far as Tommy Bear's count is concerned?

Thanks.



To: AllansAlias who wrote (31484)2/18/2002 3:14:21 PM
From: UnBelievable  Respond to of 209892
 
"There are also significant non-financial risks at play here, with the prospects of serious invasions of privacy and serious threats of physical violence becoming increasingly likely, especially during Cycle Wave C's decline, when final hopes are dashed."

Pretty amazing and more than a little scary.

We already are seeing these types of developments and Cycle Wave C doesn't happen until the end of 2002 - 2003.



To: AllansAlias who wrote (31484)4/19/2002 2:55:08 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Here's the Bear Forum link to that Tommy Bear post:

bearforum.com