Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (142761)	2/18/2002 2:55:56 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1576265

There is no rape, give it up. Allegations yes, but not nearly enough to call someone a rapist. Bull. Is there enough to convict the creep? Probably not. But there is substantial evidence that he DID rape Broadderick, nonetheless. To say, "there is no rape" is to believe a known, repeated liar who has shown no reluctance to treat women like dirt, over the words of a woman who is known as an honest, truthful individual and who put forth an extremely credible account of the events -- so much so that even horrible liberals like Patricia Ireland and Gloria Alred were forced to acknowledge the likelihood that her story was true (this still didn't stop them from supporting Clinton, but we all knew that anyway). There was, in all likelihood, a rape committed. The rapist got away with it. Just as in the case of Simpson, a murder was committed. The murderer got away with it.