Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (159226)	2/19/2002 8:34:28 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Herr Doktor Dopplescheisser PhUD,CJD, You are so lardassed stupid that you are unaware that a cross licence agreement has no money component if the exchange is more or less equal. If what Intel licences to AMD is more valuable than what AMD licences to intel then there will be a cash component to Intel. I am not sure of the details about the licence fees AMD pays to Intel, but there must have been some force involved since I am sure Intel would not willingly licence to AMD freely, or AMD has somethings that Intel needs. Possibly they had an arbitration appraise the relative merits of their cross licenced portfolios and out came that $7 million net flow to Intel? Get a mirror, study from whence the sun shines not and one day you will see that it differs from a hole in the ground, or we could puzzle you with the challenging sh*t/shinola recognition test.