Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (7093)	2/19/2002 2:44:28 PM
From: WhatsUpWithThat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48461

Saw another, related, interesting view, using Enron as an example: if a company's return on capital is less than its cost of capital...problem. Enron's ROC was 7% and its COC 11% (according to the author; haven't verified the numbers myself). Part of the problem is, it's easy to be seduced by a roaring stock price and not have the confidence and patience required to wait out the results of warnings signs like these. Cheers WUWT

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (7093)	2/20/2002 9:45:36 AM
From: BlueCheap	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48461

WJ, to be cash flow positive FONR only needs to sell 1 1/2 machines per month. Well guess what? THEY ARE DOING THAT NOW! FONAR is getting there but FONR stock is sliding. I "THINK" the $1.00 level will hold but you never know. It is just amazing to me to see how many stocks move up and yet do not have near the potential that FONR does. Yet history of FONR has proven over & over again that this current price of $1.00 has always been good for a 100% to 400% Gain within a year's time. If it does that or BETTER then that is Not bad at all considering this current Market. BlueCheap