Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (152179)	2/19/2002 2:17:10 PM
From: Lucretius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

doesn't matter...

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (152179)	2/19/2002 2:18:21 PM
From: Rarebird	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

And if they do decide to gradually sell off some of their gold reserves, so what? The Washington Agreement still stands: usagold.com The only thing that has changed for the Gold Market here is that some mindless weak hands sold. That in itself is good news.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (152179)	2/19/2002 3:19:31 PM
From: s.pecunius	Respond to of 436258

Yes, just a rumor at the moment, let me try to translate the important passage: Traders said that BuBa chief Welteke's told the following to Bloomberg: (Welteke makes a reference to the Washington agreement. And now the key sentence:) "But I could imagine that we sell something of our gold slowly and reinvest the yields into something that returns a profit." <g>It seems that he thinks something will yield more profits than gold in the future. Perhaps he wants to buy gold calls or Index puts? <g>