SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sun-tzu who wrote (152257)2/19/2002 6:31:52 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
that looks f'n miserable no matter how you slice it ... most 'improvement' is from falling billings.



To: sun-tzu who wrote (152257)2/19/2002 6:36:44 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
truly, some 'inflation' is this economy's best hope given the debt overhang



To: sun-tzu who wrote (152257)2/19/2002 6:37:05 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 436258
 
That's none too bullish, Sun...bookings remain below October, 2001? Got L-shaped recession? Oh well, at least billings are way down, surely that's good news for the industry. Who needs revenue, anyway?<G>



To: sun-tzu who wrote (152257)2/20/2002 8:21:14 AM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
i have a question about billings being consistently higher than bookings...

at some point, given appropriate time lag, shouldn't the billing number be the same as a previous booking number? maybe not exactly, but at least close? i mean, ultimately, the billings have to come from bookings, right?

or am i completely out to lunch on this...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News