SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (82344)2/19/2002 6:56:06 PM
From: Square_Dealings  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753
 
you think they are going to put out a press release? LOL

You have my word on it. Get your name on some T-Bills and gold imo.

M.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (82344)2/20/2002 5:56:28 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116753
 
February 14, 2002
Insurance and Nakedness
By Tim Picks
Market Ruminations
Key qutoe:
"Many money market funds are dropping default insurance because premiums have soared. USAA, Fidelity Investments, and Putnam Investments, have all dropped insurance. Vanguard and others are considering doing so. Those funds just got a lot riskier. One has to assume they weren't blowing the shareholders' money on insurance for no reason. Now it's no big deal?

My personal belief is that the puny additional yield in money market funds is no longer worth the risk.

If there are huge losses out there, they are likely to show up without warning. Take seriously the fact that money market funds are not federally insured. I will be keeping any uninvested funds in things that are federally insured or direct obligations of the US government. Because yields are so low (another unintended consequence of cramming interest rates down), many money funds are already absorbing expenses so investors don't take losses. There's the potential for funds to take additional risk to chase yield. We should also remember that money market funds are susceptible to the equivalent of bank runs. Obviously not in the sense that there are fractional reserves like at a bank, but in the sense that too many withdrawals could force funds to go bankrupt. Just because this has rarely happened before does not mean the risk isn't there. "
fallstreet.com