Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (2587)	2/19/2002 10:04:53 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

You attitude, that it would just be an isolated event, and not part of any war, is similar to Clinton's that contributed a lot to September 11th. I didn't say it would be just an isolated event. I simply treated the isolated terrorist event separate from the broader communist event because they have different qualities. Tiny steps for tiny tots, as an old colleague of mine used to say. In the isolated terrorist event, it doesn't matter if the perp is a commie or a disgruntled dentist. The larger scenario is where it matters. I discussed that separately. Several times. There were two sub-scenarios. The first was a military attack from a communist power. The second was a change to our system from within. Ring any bells? We reviewed it this morning. I talked about how low the probability was of either of them. Both very, very bad, but unlikely. Did you read the David Horowitz article I posted? No. I told you before I'm not interested in partisan stuff. Nor am I interested in engaging you in further discussion. It's fruitless. I'm just trying to put the current subject to rest once and for all. Karen