Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (2609)	2/20/2002 11:15:06 AM
From: gao seng	Respond to of 7720

Karen, first of all, I wish to thank you for a clean fight! You throw good hard punches, and do not resort to the type of tactics that are too common on SI, mainly wild mischaracterizations of posts, and making out of context remarks. Like if I say, I deplore those that I think like that deplorable act is acceptable, a response would be that I think that deplorable act is acceptable. Thanks. Now, I think that consideration of the fact taht a risk assessment of a further attack from a communist would be greater, should be part of the risk assessment of the initial attack, and not to mention that the initial attack would be more sinister and well planned. If an attack was launched through the politboro, I think would be a terrible attack. I mean, Kennedy could may well have been a commie attack, and look at the damage that did.