Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (142827)	2/20/2002 10:48:41 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577183

David Re..Well, I think we're arguing semantics here. But your position defies logic: How can a person be tried for a crime that hasn't occurred?<<<<<<< The same way a theorem gets approved or if you are an accountant, the same way you prove your numbers. Have the controlling party approve it. In your case your supervisor and the tax payor has to sign the tax statement before you can say the tax statement is done . In a mathematicians case, a theorem isn't accepted as a theorem until the academy of Sciences studies the theorem and its axioms, and verifies the outcome. In the court system, just because the police or DA brings a charge, doesn't mean it is officially accepted as a crime, until a court verifies it by passing judgement upon the charges. <<I do not believe that a thinking person could have concluded the man was not guilty. <<<<<<<< ONce again, over 50% of the black community in LA thought the police rigged at least some of the evidence, and close to 40% of the white community did. OJ's jury consisted of 4 white and 8 black or mixed color jurors. It was the black communities suspicions of the LA police dept. that the Dream team worked on, especially Mark Furman, and convinced enough jurors that the evidence could have been rigged. You can insult the black community at your peril, by calling them idiots. I won't.