Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SouthFloridaGuy who wrote (57722)	2/20/2002 9:57:46 AM
From: JeffT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

If you do not know the answer to mindmeld's questions then how can you in good conscience make a post like you did.... Message 17084705 Jeff

To: SouthFloridaGuy who wrote (57722)	2/20/2002 11:50:29 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Now you are being ridiculous. Off-shore related companies all have to be disclosed through the SEC. If Cisco had minority interests in any company, that would have to be disclosed (and is routinely). For you to say Cisco is doing something illegal and have no proof whatsoever is just plain irresponsible. With Enron, they were doing illegal things all the time and it was plain for anybody to see, if they knew where to look (the hiding of losses as commodities trades, the offloading of debt to related partnerships, the booking of employee travel through Lay's sister's travel agency, etc.).