SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sal99 who wrote (113785)2/20/2002 2:38:22 PM
From: Stephen M. DeMoss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
qcom: 36.8 <G>. Eom. Steve D.



To: sal99 who wrote (113785)2/20/2002 2:43:48 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
sal99: You are much to kind and considerate. Many who have posted on this thread both in the recent past and before are well-qualified for the "Ignore this person designation".

I currently have about five on my list. Most of them have been there for several months and I believe that I have lost nothing in the way of understanding re: QCOM having them on perpetual ignore.



To: sal99 who wrote (113785)2/20/2002 2:52:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Respond to of 152472
 
You may ignore me, but you won't be able to ignore a falling stock-price.

Be long QSAND, frogs! :-)



To: sal99 who wrote (113785)2/20/2002 3:15:51 PM
From: Keith Feral  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Dave, Dipy, Illmarinen, jorgie, mucho maas, puck, and rajala are the people I have put on permanent ignore. It is much easier not to have to deal with their constant negativity.



To: sal99 who wrote (113785)2/20/2002 8:42:20 PM
From: Dennis O'Bell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
My reason for ignoring button-pushers like him is like my reason for not doing drugs : waste of precious time.

Mark-- I agree. Dippy is the first and only person I've ever put on ignore