To: Cal Gary who wrote (8865 ) 2/21/2002 11:06:13 PM From: axial Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14101 Hi, Cal -"I hope DMX will work on their IR....Get way loud with the message..." Time's a-wastin'. We're almost at March. If DMX really does intend to list on the NASDAQ Big Board (only my guess where they want to list on NASDAQ), then they're going to have to "git ahold'a this mutha " . The Big Board requires 90 days trading at a minimum $5 US: $7.50 CDN. There has to be a dramatic change in the stock's trading patterns. The stock has a hyperbolic beta, and the market's traditional reaction is to trade against the news. It's practically become a Canadian sport, and the stock, especially in a poor market, can't sustain any momentum. Preparation for NASDAQ will necessarily require the changes you suggest, and then some; there will have to be changes in the company's policy (if there is one) on disclosure. The script that the longs have been studying reads (not completely, and not necessarily in this order) FDA Pennsaid approval, J+J, HC approval, WF10 data, FDA submission with possible Fast Track, NASDAQ listing. Over the next few months, there is going to have to be a tremendous change in the way DMX handles, and disseminates news. The company is going to need a good strategy, strong partners - and sustainable share price. To me, these things mean that the company is going to have to change quickly. Can REK and the board make these changes? Can she silence the critics with a dazzling display of savvy moves? Can she do "the Cinderella thing" ? Like it or not, the time has come to walk the talk. If we don't see these changes happening in the next couple of months, it will (for me, anyway) throw into question whether the company can even achieve the aims it has announced. For others, it will probably go to deeper questions of credibility. In the best sense, not the pejorative - DMX is going to have to grow up. Regards, Jim