SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: milo_morai who wrote (159619)2/21/2002 1:26:19 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Milo, Re: "you're clueless MSFT hosted the series."

Did they host it for AMD, or did they do it for Stanford?

Think about it.

wbmw



To: milo_morai who wrote (159619)2/21/2002 1:37:29 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ban Ban MindBlo - THAT SEMINAR was 17 months ago !!!

So - where is this Hamster chip?

McGrath went out of his way to say how EASY everything got in the design cycle - and then MAD slipped the schedule by OVER A YEAR !!

What a HOOT !!

And guess what ?

McGrath VALIDATED Intel's ITanium approach - didn't he !!

Yep - you know he did !!



To: milo_morai who wrote (159619)2/21/2002 4:37:57 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Moron - Re:"MSFT hosted the series."

Microsoft sponsors Stanford and the seminar was at Stanford. So you make the logical-to-only-an-AMDroid conclusion that support for Stanford proves that MS will provide OS support for X86-64.

Total nonsense !!

You are ignoring the fact that you were caught in a RED-FACED LIE. You originally stated that "if you listen to the Stanford presentation it appears MSFT is on board". The presentation when viewed shows you are a LIAR.

So you change the subject and offer "proof" that Microsoft supports Stanford. Does that also "prove" that MS will move its corporate headquarters to Palo Alto?