Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (11074)	2/21/2002 2:31:34 PM
From: Bill Fischofer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Re: Anglion But this number is a complex. It houses another number which we call prime, or 89. This is the smallest prime number possible from 1573965, its forerunner. Unfortunately not true. 1573965 factors as 3 x 3 x 3 x 5 x 89 x 131. 89 is not the "smallest prime number". That is 3. If this is going to be about "demonstration" rather than "rhetoric" wouldn't it be best to start out by being mathematically accurate in one's statements?